420 Posts in 208 Topics by 63 members
If this is your first visit, you will need to register before you can post. However, you can browse all messages below.
| Thread | Order: Newest | Oldest | Title | RSS Feed |
|
Fourth V6-9 beta release - 16 November 2018
On the 16th of November 2018 we completed another release sprint of the development version of GLOBE Claritas (V6-9) and were able to provide a download for the latest beta release to our Linux clients. Some of the new functionality and features in this beta release included:- • Griffon (New application) – Griffon performs interactive trace header maths on HDF5 datasets, updating existing headers or creating new headers with the results of user defined maths expressions (https://www.yout... 1 month ago |
||
|
Video Tutorials
New YouTube video giving a sneak peak of a new application for trace header maths - available for users in the next beta release : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw9rrege_6A 1 month ago |
||
|
Third V6-9 beta release - 19 October 2018
On the 19th of October 2018 we completed another release sprint of the development version of GLOBE Claritas (V6-9) and were able to provide a download for the latest beta release to our Linux clients. Some of the new functionality and features in this beta release included:- • GEOMETRY – New option added to crooked line binning for extremely crooked lines, to allow for improved binning fidelity. Each trace has a brute force check to define best fit for the CDP into which it bins - allo... 2 months ago |
||
|
statics
Refraction statics corrects for variation in near surface terrain. On land seismic surveys, we can expect the near surface terrain to vary significantly. In a few meters we might go from soft, marshy ground to a weathered outcrop. This can lead to large, localised velocity variations which distort the seismic travel times. Static shifts to correct for this can be obtained by using a 'replacement velocity'. One approach to estimating this velocity is to model it from the first-arrival picks of a... 2 months ago |
||
|
statics
Do we need to use refraction statics when processing seismic reflection data ?? 2 months ago |
||
|
Apply DATUM_FIX module
Ok, I can send all my flows which lead to my static's workflow with the data. Thank you again. Matthieu. 2 months ago |
||
|
Apply DATUM_FIX module
If you can send your jobflow, support files and a sample of your dataset through to claritas.support@gns.cri.nz we can try to take a look and see what the issue might be. 2 months ago |
||
|
Apply DATUM_FIX module
I want to use both refraction's corrections from the refstat's workflow and the elevation's correction to a fix datum. I use STATIC module only for the the *.shf file output from refstat's workflow, but I also want to apply elevation's corrections for total static corrections. I know that I must use the DATUM_FIX module for elevation's corrections, but I don't see any differencies whether I use or not the module in my flow, because the total static corrections in my traces show no change,... 3 months ago |
||
|
Apply DATUM_FIX module
Shifting to a floating datum and/or fixed seismic reference datum helps to correct for the effect of topography / elevation. Refractions statics (refstat application) on the other hand corrects for variation in near surface terrain. On land seismic surveys, we can expect the near surface terrain to vary significantly. In a few meters we might go from soft, marshy ground to a weathered outcrop. This can lead to large, localised velocity variations which distort the seismic travel times. Is... 3 months ago |
||
|
Apply DATUM_FIX module
My jobflow looks like this : 1 - SEISJOB 2 - SEISREAD 3 - ADDGEOM 4 - STATIC 5 - DATUM_FIX 6 - SEISWRITE Only my *.shf file is applied for the static correction, but no elevation correction. However, if I use the command "Datum" and "Vel_datum" in the STATIC module, some corrections are applied to my data. 3 months ago |
||